174
of the issue ruised by Mr. Sloss until he was available for
discussion.
4.
On the Dist December, 1945, the Secretary of State
for the Colonies appointed a strong Committec, which
included Mr. Slogs as well as representatives of the
universities in this country and a representative of the
Foreign Office, to advise him on whether the University
should serve the local needs of Hong Kong only or the needs
of students from China and other neighbouring territories.
11. The Committee's recommendation.
5.
The Committee, whose Report dated July, 1946, forms
Appendix 2 to this memorandum, had the following terms of
reference:-
6.
"(a) whether or not the University of Hong Kong, as such, should continue to exist and if so the policy which should govern its resuscitation and
"(b) the steps necessary to restart such of the work hitherto undertaken by the University as is essential for the needs of Hong Kɔng, whatever the decision arrived at on the broader issue,"
Briefly the conclusion of the Committee was that
the needs of Hong Kong alone do not justify the maintenance
of a university but that a first class university would be
of very great value in the maintenence of good relations
with China and other Far Eastern territories; they there-
fore considered that it "should be re-established as soon
as possible on a firm financial basis with staff and
facilities adequate to make it fully capable of reaching
British academic standards and becoming an effective centre
for Sino-British contact in the sphere of learning".
Committee added that they believed "that the restoration or
The
Ze
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.